<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cleveland Hibore Monster XLS &#124; Driver Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.golfclubdriverreview.com/cleveland-hibore-monster-xls-driver-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.golfclubdriverreview.com/cleveland-hibore-monster-xls-driver-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken Johnstone</title>
		<link>http://www.golfclubdriverreview.com/cleveland-hibore-monster-xls-driver-review/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Johnstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 12:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfclubdriverreview.com/?p=51#comment-66</guid>
		<description>No..Not for me. I purchased this new driver from Cleveland as I&#039;ve owned the original Hi-Bore XLS for the past 18 months or so and have been very impressed with it. (I once went 5 rounds without missing a fairway!) This &quot;new&quot; larger-headed version simply doesn&#039;t cut it for me. Too difficult to hit. Doesn&#039;t &quot;sit&quot; well at address, and *WAY* too many off-fairway drives. Also no improvement in distance over the original model. In my opinion, just a way for Cleveland to milk the outstanding success of the original model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No..Not for me. I purchased this new driver from Cleveland as I&#8217;ve owned the original Hi-Bore XLS for the past 18 months or so and have been very impressed with it. (I once went 5 rounds without missing a fairway!) This &#8220;new&#8221; larger-headed version simply doesn&#8217;t cut it for me. Too difficult to hit. Doesn&#8217;t &#8220;sit&#8221; well at address, and *WAY* too many off-fairway drives. Also no improvement in distance over the original model. In my opinion, just a way for Cleveland to milk the outstanding success of the original model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
